Fieldwork in Breisach, Germany

25 September, 2017 Florence Fröhlig participated in the 336th so called Mannwache in the German town of Breisach. The meeting has been organized every Monday evening since the Fukushima catastrophe in 2011, in order to call attention to the dangers of nuclear energy production. In the local region, on both sides of the French-German border, the meeting forms one part of the anti-nuclear movement requiring a shut-down of the nuclear power plant located in the Fessenheim on the French side, but less than 20 kilometers from Breisach.



Nuclear Legacies conference, Stockholm, Sweden

14-16 September, 2017 The Nuclear Legacies conference in Stockholm gathered 35 international scholars from different disciplines. Apart from presenting and discussing our ongoing research, we visited the closed down nuclear reactors R1 and Ågesta located respectively at the KTH campus and in the Stockholm suburb of Farsta. Another way to stimulate discussions was by interacting with artists who are dealing with nuclear issues – among them Carl Johan Erikson and Karin Willén and their project “10°C – Recipes from the archipelago of Forsmark”. As a public part of the conference, we organized an opening of a photo exhibition about Ågesta and a panel discussion on the topic Nuclear Heritage – What to do with it? in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Technology. The full conference program is available here.

Russian Nuclear Cultural Heritage at Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

11 September, 2017. Can Russia use its nuclear cultural heritage to come to terms with its Imperial and Soviet past? Egle Rindzeviciute presented her ongoing work at the STS Circle seminar in Harvard University, USA. The STS Circle at Harvard is a group of doctoral students and recent PhDs who are interested in creating a space for interdisciplinary conversations about contemporary issues in science and technology that are relevant to people in fields such as anthropology, history of science, sociology, STS, law, government, public policy, and the natural sciences. The seminar series seek to engage not only those who are working on intersections of science, politics, and public policy, but also those in the natural sciences, engineering, and architecture who have serious interest in exploring these areas together with social scientists and humanists.The Harvard STS Circle is co-sponsored by the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, and the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.


Art residency in Riga, Latvia

8-22 July, 2017 Egle Rindzeviciute was invited as a tutor at the art residency “Trauma & Revival: Contemporary Encounters” in Riga, Latvia. The art residency was co-funded by the Creative Europe Programme of the European Union (2015-2018), Latvia 100, Latvian Culture Capital Foundation, BAFF, Embassy of the United States, and co-ordinated by kim? Contemporary Art Centre in cooperation with BOZAR. The residency proposed workshops, lectures, master-classes, discussions, encounters, debates, and open studio events gathering emerging artists and researchers from Eastern and Western Europe, including Russia. The travelling exhibition Facing the Future: Art in Europe 1945-1968 (curated by Peter Weibel and Eckhart Gillen) served as a point of departure. In Riga, the residency workshops revisited the historical complexities, common memories and imagined futures that have been significant in the East – West dichotomy relationship, particularly in the infrastructure of the Baltic countries, which has been a frontier between Russia and Europe. Dr Rindzeviciute curated a week-long programme which included lectures on nuclear heritage and nuclear legacy in public health in the Baltic states, and visits to the Latvian Radiation Safety Centre and the Latvian University Museum of Informatics.

Click here for more information on Trauma&Revival.

Workshop on “Nuclear fun: banalising the atom in public display”, Barcelona, Spain

June 21-22, 2017 Tatiana Kasperski and co-organizers Jaume Sastre-Juan and Jaume Valentines-Álvarez held a workshop on “Nuclear fun: banalising the atom in public display” at the University Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Spain. Can nuclear technologies be fun? This was the central question that the participants tried to answer in a series of papers covering the experiences of England, Spain, Portugal, Ukraine and elsewhere. Since the 1950s, the circulation and social acceptance of nuclear technologies has not only been shaped and mediated by techno-utopian dreams of cornucopian abundance and the awe of technological sublime, but also by a playful familiarisation seeking to overcome resistance, distrust and fear of an apocalyptic future. The goal of the workshop was to explore the history of ‘nuclear fun’ and to analyse the role of entertainment, ludic and participatory displays in shaping the cultural representation and the material proliferation of nuclear technologies.


Fieldwork in Moscow, Obninsk and St Petersburg, Russia

May 13-29, 2017 Egle Rindzeviciute spent two weeks visiting atomic heritage sites in Russia. She worked in the archives of the Polytechnic Museum in Moscow, explored the world’s first commercial nuclear power plant in Obninsk (1954) and interviewed atomic heritage professionals as well as scholars studying nuclear legacies in Russia. A formerly secret science city, Obninsk is home to the Institute of Physics and Power Engineering which is developing a memorial complex dedicated to the origins of peaceful applications of nuclear energy in Russia. (By a decree of Stalin, the nuclear physics Laboratory V was founded in the Obninsko settlement in 1946, and in 1956 Obninsk obtained city status – see picture below.) On 15 May Rindzeviciute gave a lecture on nuclear heritage in Russia to the postgraduates at the School of Cultural Studies at the National Research University – Higher School of Economics, Moscow.

Visit to the Zion station, USA

May 5, 2017 Together with colleagues from Stockholm University, Anna Storm visited the Zion station located on the shore of lake Michigan, about an hour’s drive north of Chicago. The nuclear power plant is currently undergoing decommissioning. Many of the structures are already gone, and soon also the two reactor buildings will be torn down. All radioactive waste is relocated by ship or train transport, except for the spent fuel stay which stay on site in so called dry cask storage. When decommissioning is finished, most of the site will be replanted and the beach will be opened for public use.

Fieldwork in St. Petersburg and Sosnovy Bor, Russia

April 23-29, 2017 Andrei Stsiapanau, the project research fellow, went on field work in St. Petersburg and Sosnovy Bor to conduct interviews with participants and key actors of the discussions over the construction of the radioactive waste depository. Russian corporation «Rosatom» considers to build a radioactive waste underground depository on the shore of the Gulf of Finland which extends between Russia, Finland and Estonia. The planned location is the city of Sosnovy Bor, with 67 thousand of population, 40 kilometers away from St. Petersburg, near the Leningrad nuclear power plant. Sosnovy Bor became a nuclear city in 1973, when the first unit of the Leningrad nuclear power plant was launched. The start of the first unit of the new Leningrad nuclear plant, which will replace the old RBMK reactors, is scheduled for 2017. In addition, within the city three nuclear sites – Research Institute, which is now testing the ship’s nuclear power plants, the melting plant of radioactive metals “Ecomet-S” and the radioactive waste repository of the Russian North-West region are located.

During the visit April 26 to the Sosnovy Bor Andrei Stsiapanau attended the Chernobyl disaster commemorative meeting and ceremony with the participation of the former liquidators of the Chernobyl disaster consequences, of the Leningrad NPP and Sosnovy Bor city administrations.  The same day at the Center for Independent Social Research in Saint-Petersburg Andrei Stsiapanau gave a talk in which he shared with the public his thoughts about very different representations about Chernobyl disaster in political discourses in Belarus and Russia.